Do it is thought by you is better for students to work before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, simpler to write, much easier to read.

working experience, contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as prone to find employment…..

Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will change their higher education course while at uni….

Lots of people think that it is better to learn something in a group in the place of individually. Can you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
more aged way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some people think that children have to do organised activities inside their time that is free while think that children should always be absolve to do what they need to accomplish inside their spare time. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons 123helpme and examples to guide your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it could be unfair to this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to get
-furthermore studies show that the mind operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Lots of people say that globalisation and also the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. As to what extent would you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your role.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their lives that are daily. However, many people have never changed the real way they live. Why do you would imagine many individuals never have taken action that is individual? What could be done to cause them to become take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy for the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……

Some believe that may be the responsibility of individuals to take care of environmental surroundings. Others say it will be the government which should take care regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should care for the environmental surroundings because:
Our company is the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should care for the environment because:
They usually have the capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians associated with country, this means collectively these are typically guardians for the earth… although not true in fact

Both should always be doing more!

In several countries small shops and town centers are going away from business, because people tend to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to an increase in car use, plus it means that people without cars have limited usage of out-of-town stores. Do you believe features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *